Last week, Mike Montiero shared a Harvard Business Review article that sparked considerable backlash. The article, titled “Seven Rules for Managing Creative-But-Difficult People” (title has been changed from the original “Seven Rules for Managing Creative People”) has amassed over 700 comments. It’s currently the most read and commented article on HBR in the past 30 days.
Montiero, author of Design is a Job and respected voice among the design community didn’t hold back when he found the article. In fact he expressed as much disappointment in HBR as he did at the author.
— Mike Monteiro (@ Mike_FTW) April 7, 2013
I recommend reading the post to fully understand Montiero’s disgust, but here are a few of the highlights from the list:
Spoil them and let them fail: Like parents who celebrate their children’s mess…
Surround them by semi-boring people:
Pay them poorlyDon’t overpay them: There is a longstanding debate about the relationship between intrinsic and extrinsic motivation… The moral of the story?
A Missed Opportunity for Healthy Discussion
I can see how the post may offend, but I also see the points that author Tomas Chamorro-Premuzic was trying to make. Unless his intent was to incite a flame war — in which case he probably exceeded all expectations — I’d argue that the post can teach us a lesson in the power of poorly communicated thoughts.
If you look beneath the surface of the author’s claims, he dances around some important and valid points concerning motivation, the creative thought process and managing teams.
I think the author erred in two simple ways:
- He singled out and stereotyped “creatives” as some knowable “other” (read more: “Hellish Other People” by Cennydd Bowles).
- He not only uses a demeaning voice in his post, he promotes demeaning management tactics.
Rather than harp on miscommunication, I’d like to divert attention to somebody who I’d say tells a similar story in a less confrontational way.
Dan Pink: The Puzzle of Motivation
If you line up the HBR post and Pink’s TED talk side-by-side, they actually touch on many of the same points. But Pink does two things differently:
- He doesn’t single out people, he singles out types of tasks.
- He doesn’t tell the audience how to interpret or employ the research, he simply makes a case and lets his audience apply the research to their team.
Please share other positive articles and videos relating to motivation, management and creativity in the comments below.